
Inviscid Bump in a Channel
Inviscid Supersonic Wedge
Inviscid ONERA M6
Laminar Flat Plate
Laminar Cylinder
Turbulent Flat Plate
Transitional Flat Plate
Transitional Flat Plate for T3A and T3A
Turbulent ONERA M6
Unsteady NACA0012
Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification of RANS predictions of NACA 0012 airfoil
Nonideal compressible flow in a supersonic nozzle

Static FluidStructure Interaction (FSI)
Dynamic FluidStructure Interaction (FSI) using the Python wrapper and a Nastran structural model
Static Conjugate Heat Transfer (CHT)
Unsteady Conjugate Heat Transfer
SolidtoSolid Conjugate Heat Transfer with Contact Resistance
Incompressible, Laminar Combustion Simulation

Unconstrained shape design of a transonic inviscid airfoil at a cte. AoA
Constrained shape design of a transonic turbulent airfoil at a cte. C_{L}
Constrained shape design of a transonic inviscid wing at a cte. C_{L}
Shape Design With Multiple Objectives and Penalty Functions
Unsteady Shape Optimization NACA0012
Unconstrained shape design of a two way mixing channel
Laminar Cylinder
Written by  for Version  Revised by  Revision date  Revised version 

@economon  7.0.0  @talbring  20200303  7.0.2 
Solver: 

Uses: 

Prerequisites: 
None 
Complexity: 
Basic 
Goals
Upon completing this tutorial, the user will be familiar with performing a simulation of external, laminar flow around a 2D geometry. The specific geometry chosen for the tutorial is a cylinder. Consequently, the following capabilities of SU2 will be showcased:
 Steady, 2D Laminar NavierStokes equations
 Multigrid
 Roe convective scheme in space (2ndorder, upwind)
 Corrected averageofgradients viscous scheme
 Euler implicit time integration
 NavierStokes wall (noslip) and farfield boundary conditions
In this tutorial, we discuss some numerical method options, including how to activate a slope limiter for upwind methods.
Resources
The resources for this tutorial can be found in the compressible_flow/Laminar_Cylinder directory in the tutorial repository. You will need the configuration file (lam_cylinder.cfg) and the mesh file (mesh_cylinder_lam.su2).
Experimental results for drag over a cylinder at low Reynolds numbers are reported in the following article: D. J. Tritton, “Experiments on the flow past a circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 547567, 1959. Note that the mesh used for this tutorial is rather coarse, and for comparison of the results with literature, finer meshes should be used.
Tutorial
The following tutorial will walk you through the steps required when solving for the external flow around a cylinder using SU2. It is assumed you have already obtained and compiled the SU2_CFD code for a serial computation. If you have yet to complete these requirements, please see the Download and Installation pages.
Background
The flow around a 2D circular cylinder is a case that has been used extensively both for validation purposes and as a legitimate research case over the years. At very low Reynolds numbers of less than about 46, the flow is steady and symmetric. As the Reynolds number is increased, asymmetries and timedependence develop, eventually resulting in the wellknown Von Karmann vortex street, and then on to turbulence.
Problem Setup
This problem will solve the for the external, compressible flow over the cylinder with these conditions:
 Freestream temperature = 273.15 K
 Freestream Mach number = 0.1
 Angle of attack (AOA) = 0.0 degrees
 Reynolds number = 40 for a cylinder radius of 1 m
Mesh Description
The problem geometry is 2D. The mesh has 26,192 triangular elements and 13,336 points. It is fine near the surface of the cylinder to resolve the boundary layer. The exterior boundary is approximately 15 diameters away from the cylinder surface to avoid interaction between the boundary conditions. Farfield boundary conditions are used at the outer boundary. Noslip boundary conditions are placed on the surface of the cylinder.
Figure (1): The computational mesh for the 2D cylinder test case.
The outer boundary in red is the farfield, and the small circle in the center is the cylinder which uses the NavierStokes Wall boundary condition.
Configuration File Options
Several of the key configuration file options for this simulation are highlighted here. This case exhibits exceptional convergence, given the combination of very aggressive CFL, linear solver settings, and multigrid. In this tutorial, we would like to highlight the options concerning the specification of convective schemes:
%  FLOW NUMERICAL METHOD DEFINITION %
%
% Convective numerical method (JST, LAXFRIEDRICH, CUSP, ROE, AUSM, HLLC,
% TURKEL_PREC, MSW)
CONV_NUM_METHOD_FLOW= ROE
%
% Monotonic Upwind Scheme for Conservation Laws (TVD) in the flow equations.
% Required for 2nd order upwind schemes (NO, YES)
MUSCL_FLOW= YES
%
% Slope limiter (NONE, VENKATAKRISHNAN, VENKATAKRISHNAN_WANG,
% BARTH_JESPERSEN, VAN_ALBADA_EDGE)
SLOPE_LIMITER_FLOW= NONE
%
% Coefficient for the Venkat's limiter (upwind scheme). A larger values decrease
% the extent of limiting, values approaching zero cause
% lowerorder approximation to the solution (0.05 by default)
VENKAT_LIMITER_COEFF= 0.05
For laminar flow around the cylinder, we choose the Roe upwind scheme with 2ndorder reconstruction (MUSCL_FLOW = YES
). This lowspeed case is executed without a slope limiter. Note that, in order to activate the slope limiter for the upwind methods, SLOPE_LIMITER_FLOW
must be set to something other than NONE
. Otherwise, no limiting will be applied to the convective flux during the higherorder reconstruction. Limiting is not applicable if MUSCL_FLOW = NO
, as there is no higherorder reconstruction, and thus, no need to limit the gradients. The viscous terms are computed with the corrected averageofgradients method (by default). Several limiters are available in SU2, including the popular VENKATAKRISHNAN
limiter for unstructured grids. It is recommended that users experiment with the VENKAT_LIMITER_COEFF
value for their own applications.
Lastly, it should be mentioned that the MUSCL reconstruction and slope limiting apply only to the upwind schemes. If you choose one of the centered convective schemes, e.g., JST or LaxFriedrich, there is no reconstruction process. JST and LaxFriedrich are 2ndorder and 1storder by construction, respectively, and the scalar dissipation for these schemes can be tuned with the JST_SENSOR_COEFF
and LAX_SENSOR_COEFF
options, respectively.
Running SU2
The cylinder simulation for the 13,336 node mesh is small and will execute relatively quickly on a single workstation or laptop in serial. To run this test case, follow these steps at a terminal command line:
 Move to the directory containing the configuration file (lam_cylinder.cfg) and the mesh file (mesh_cylinder_lam.su2). Make sure that the SU2 tools were compiled, installed, and that their install location was added to your path.

Run the executable by entering
$ SU2_CFD lam_cylinder.cfg
at the command line.
 SU2 will print residual updates with each iteration of the flow solver, and the simulation will terminate after meeting the specified convergence criteria.
 Files containing the results will be written upon exiting SU2. The flow solution can be visualized in ParaView (.vtk) or Tecplot (.dat for ASCII).
Results
The following results show the flow around the cylinder as calculated by SU2 (note that these were for a slightly higher Mach number of 0.3).
Figure (2): Pressure contours around the cylinder.
Figure (3): Laminar viscosity contours for this steady, low Reynolds number flow.
Figure (4): Mach number contours around the cylinder with streamlines. Note the large laminar separation region behind the cylinder at Re = 40.
 Previous
 Next